Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24063 Rivière-du-Nord (Quebec)
"
We also supported the same Prime Minister in introducing same-sex marriage and imposing a moratorium on the criminalization of cannabis. However, governments that ignored Quebec or abused the rights of Quebeckers remember the opposition work of the Bloc Québécois.
"
Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply
Speech From The Throne
January 25th, 2016 / 11:05 a.m.
Bloc
Rhéal Fortin Rivière-du-Nord, QC
https://openparliament.ca/debates/2016/1/25/rheal-fortin-1/
We, the undersigned, Citizens or residents of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to establish an independent, fully-empowered Royal Commission into the health, social and economic costs associated with the legalization of Cannabis use including costs associated with prohibition, discrimination, organized crime, political favouritism and corruption.
Showing posts with label Bloc Québécois. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bloc Québécois. Show all posts
Friday, May 20, 2016
Saturday, March 26, 2016
Michel Boudrias, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24075 Terrebonne (Quebec)
Michel Boudrias, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24075 Terrebonne (Quebec)
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
| |||||||||||||
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Rankin (Victoria), seconded by Ms. Quach (Salaberry—Suroît), — That the House: (a) recognize the contradiction of continuing to give Canadian criminal records for simple possession of marijuana after the government has stated that it should not be a crime; (b) recognize that this situation is unacceptable to Canadians, municipalities and law enforcement agencies; (c) recognize that a growing number of voices, including that of a former Liberal prime minister, are calling for decriminalization to address this gap; and (d) call upon the government to immediately decriminalize the simple possession of marijuana for personal use.
|
Conformément à l'article 45 du Règlement, la Chambre procède au vote par appel nominal différé sur la motion de M. Rankin (Victoria), appuyé par Mme Quach (Salaberry—Suroît), — Que la Chambre : a) reconnaisse la contradiction de continuer à donner un casier judiciaire aux Canadiens pour la simple possession de marijuana après que le gouvernement a affirmé que la simple possession de marijuana ne devrait pas être un crime; b) reconnaisse que cette situation est inacceptable pour les Canadiens, les municipalités et les autorités policières; c) reconnaisse qu’un nombre croissant de voix, incluant celle d’un ancien premier ministre libéral, demandent la décriminalisation pour combler cette lacune; d) réclame du gouvernement qu’il décriminalise immédiatement la possession simple de marijuana pour une utilisation personnelle.
| |||||||||
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
|
La motion, mise aux voix, est rejetée par le vote suivant :
| |||||||||
| (Division No. 89 -- Vote no 89) | ||||||||||
| YEAS: 49, NAYS: 256 | POUR : 49, CONTRE : 256 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
@michelboudrias svp faire une déclaration publique sur la politique de cannabis (rien trouvé sur Internet) & part https://t.co/6bVMmQOBOI— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) March 12, 2016
Friday, March 25, 2016
Monique Pauzé, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24060 Repentigny (QC)
Monique Pauzé, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24060 Repentigny (QC)
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
| (Division No. 89 -- Vote no 89) | |||||||||||||
| YEAS: 49, NAYS: 256 | POUR : 49, CONTRE : 256 | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Thursday, March 24, 2016
Luc Thériault, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24050 Montcalm (QC)
Luc Thériault, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24050 Montcalm (QC)
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
| (Division No. 89 -- Vote no 89) | |||||||||||||
| YEAS: 49, NAYS: 256 | POUR : 49, CONTRE : 256 | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
@LucTerjo1 pls faire une déclaration publique sur la politique de cannabis (rien trouvé sur Internet) & part https://t.co/6bVMmQOBOI— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) March 12, 2016
Simon Marcil, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24048 Mirabel (Quebec) (no cannabis policy found)
Simon Marcil, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24048 Mirabel (Quebec) (no cannabis policy found)
No cannabis policy statement found, if anyone finds one, please share! Thanks!
No cannabis policy statement found, if anyone finds one, please share! Thanks!
pls faire une déclaration publique sur la politique de cannabis (rien trouvé sur Internet) & part https://petitions.parl.gc.ca/fr/Petition/Details?Petition=e-18
Posted by Sam Vekemans on Saturday, March 12, 2016
Marilène Gill, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24046 Manicouagan (QC) (no cannabis policy statement found)
Marilène Gill, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24046 Manicouagan (QC) (no cannabis policy statement found)
If anyone finds a statement, please share! Thanks.
If anyone finds a statement, please share! Thanks.
.@GillMarilene You DID NOT VOTE for/against decriminalization cannabis motion. How would you have voted? #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/oSPrXCmLeD— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) June 24, 2016
@GillMarilene pls faire une déclaration publique sur la politique de cannabis (rien trouvé sur Internet) & part https://t.co/6bVMmQOBOI— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) March 12, 2016
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Mario Beaulieu, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24033 La Pointe-de-l'Île (QC)
Mario Beaulieu, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24033 La Pointe-de-l'Île (QC)
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
| |||||||||||||
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Rankin (Victoria), seconded by Ms. Quach (Salaberry—Suroît), — That the House: (a) recognize the contradiction of continuing to give Canadian criminal records for simple possession of marijuana after the government has stated that it should not be a crime; (b) recognize that this situation is unacceptable to Canadians, municipalities and law enforcement agencies; (c) recognize that a growing number of voices, including that of a former Liberal prime minister, are calling for decriminalization to address this gap; and (d) call upon the government to immediately decriminalize the simple possession of marijuana for personal use.
|
Conformément à l'article 45 du Règlement, la Chambre procède au vote par appel nominal différé sur la motion de M. Rankin (Victoria), appuyé par Mme Quach (Salaberry—Suroît), — Que la Chambre : a) reconnaisse la contradiction de continuer à donner un casier judiciaire aux Canadiens pour la simple possession de marijuana après que le gouvernement a affirmé que la simple possession de marijuana ne devrait pas être un crime; b) reconnaisse que cette situation est inacceptable pour les Canadiens, les municipalités et les autorités policières; c) reconnaisse qu’un nombre croissant de voix, incluant celle d’un ancien premier ministre libéral, demandent la décriminalisation pour combler cette lacune; d) réclame du gouvernement qu’il décriminalise immédiatement la possession simple de marijuana pour une utilisation personnelle.
| |||||||||
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
|
La motion, mise aux voix, est rejetée par le vote suivant :
| |||||||||
| (Division No. 89 -- Vote no 89) | ||||||||||
| YEAS: 49, NAYS: 256 | POUR : 49, CONTRE : 256 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
@Mario_Beaulieu pls faire une déclaration publique sur la politique de cannabis (rien trouvé sur Internet) & part https://t.co/6bVMmQOBOI— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) March 12, 2016
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Gabriel Ste-Marie, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24031 Joliette (QC) (no cannabis policy statement found)
Gabriel Ste-Marie, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24031 Joliette (QC) (no cannabis policy statement found)
If anyone finds a statement, please share! Thanks!
2016-07-19 6:45 GMT-07:00 <Gabriel.Ste-Marie@parl.gc.ca>:
Madame, Monsieur,
Nous accusons réception de votre courriel.
Pour toute urgence, veuillez nous joindre par téléphone au 450 752-1940.
Nos heures d’ouverture sont du lundi au vendredi, de 9 h à 12 h et de 13 h à 16 h.
Veuillez recevoir, Madame, Monsieur, nos salutations distinguées.
If anyone finds a statement, please share! Thanks!
2016-07-19 6:45 GMT-07:00 <Gabriel.Ste-Marie@parl.gc.ca>:
Madame, Monsieur,
Nous accusons réception de votre courriel.
Pour toute urgence, veuillez nous joindre par téléphone au 450 752-1940.
Nos heures d’ouverture sont du lundi au vendredi, de 9 h à 12 h et de 13 h à 16 h.
Veuillez recevoir, Madame, Monsieur, nos salutations distinguées.
.@Gabriel_SMarie You DID NOT VOTE for/against decriminalization cannabis motion. How would you have voted? #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/e9jos1KmJs— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) June 24, 2016
@Gabriel_SMarie pls faire une déclaration publique sur la politique de cannabis (rien trouvé sur Internet) & part https://t.co/6bVMmQOBOI— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) March 12, 2016
Saturday, March 19, 2016
Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24014 Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes— Verchères (QC)
Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24014 Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes— Verchères (QC)
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
If anyone finds a statement, please share! Thanks!
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Rankin (Victoria), seconded by Ms. Quach (Salaberry—Suroît), — That the House: (a) recognize the contradiction of continuing to give Canadian criminal records for simple possession of marijuana after the government has stated that it should not be a crime; (b) recognize that this situation is unacceptable to Canadians, municipalities and law enforcement agencies; (c) recognize that a growing number of voices, including that of a former Liberal prime minister, are calling for decriminalization to address this gap; and (d) call upon the government to immediately decriminalize the simple possession of marijuana for personal use.
|
Conformément à l'article 45 du Règlement, la Chambre procède au vote par appel nominal différé sur la motion de M. Rankin (Victoria), appuyé par Mme Quach (Salaberry—Suroît), — Que la Chambre : a) reconnaisse la contradiction de continuer à donner un casier judiciaire aux Canadiens pour la simple possession de marijuana après que le gouvernement a affirmé que la simple possession de marijuana ne devrait pas être un crime; b) reconnaisse que cette situation est inacceptable pour les Canadiens, les municipalités et les autorités policières; c) reconnaisse qu’un nombre croissant de voix, incluant celle d’un ancien premier ministre libéral, demandent la décriminalisation pour combler cette lacune; d) réclame du gouvernement qu’il décriminalise immédiatement la possession simple de marijuana pour une utilisation personnelle.
| |||||||||
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
|
La motion, mise aux voix, est rejetée par le vote suivant :
| |||||||||
| (Division No. 89 -- Vote no 89) | ||||||||||
| YEAS: 49, NAYS: 256 | POUR : 49, CONTRE : 256 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
If anyone finds a statement, please share! Thanks!
@XavierBarsalouD pls faire une déclaration publique sur la politique de cannabis (rien trouvé sur Internet) & part https://t.co/6bVMmQOBOI— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) March 12, 2016
Monday, January 20, 2014
Louis Plamondon, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24009 Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel (Quebec)
Louis Plamondon, Bloc Member of Parliament for 24009 Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel (Quebec)
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/Louis-Plamondon(413)
**
don't know stance
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/Louis-Plamondon(413)
Louis Plamondon
Web Site:www.louisplamondon.com (in French only)
Preferred Language:French
Hill Office
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada
K1A 0A6
Telephone: 613-995-9241
Fax: 613-995-6784
Mail may be sent postage-free to any Member of Parliament.
Constituency Office(s)
- 307 Marie Victorin Road (Main Office) Sorel-Tracy, Québec J3R 1K6 Telephone: 450-742-0479 Fax: 450-742-1976
- 702 Monseigneur Panet Street Nicolet, Québec J3T 1C6 Telephone: 819-293-2041 Fax: 819-293-5522
© House of Commons
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Journals&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8358958&File=0
| (Division No. 89 -- Vote no 89) | |||||||||||||
| YEAS: 49, NAYS: 256 | POUR : 49, CONTRE : 256 | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
**
don't know stance
Claude Patry, MP - Jonquière—Alma (Quebec)
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/Claude-Patry(71413)
http://openparliament.ca/politicians/claude-patry/
https://www.facebook.com/claude.patry.9
no MP website available
don't know stance
http://openparliament.ca/politicians/claude-patry/
https://www.facebook.com/claude.patry.9
no MP website available
Claude Patry
Email:Claude.Patry@parl.gc.ca
Preferred Language:French
Hill Office
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada
K1A 0A6
Telephone: 613-995-8425
Fax: 613-947-2748
Mail may be sent postage-free to any Member of Parliament.
Constituency Office(s)
- 3885 Harvey Blvd (Main Office) Suite 204 Jonquiere, Québec G7X 9B1 Telephone: 418-695-7554 Fax: 418-695-4467
- 3885 Harvey Blvd Jonquiere, Québec G7X 9B1 Telephone: 418-480-1879 Fax: 418-480-4150
© House of Commons
don't know stance
Labels:
420,
Bloc Québécois,
cannabis,
drugs,
marihuana,
marijuana,
prohibition,
Quebec,
unknown
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
Jean-François Fortin, MP - Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia
http://www.parl.gc.ca/MembersOfParliament/ProfileMP.aspx?Key=170403&Language=E
http://www.jffortin.info/accueil.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Fran%C3%A7ois_Fortin_(politician)
http://openparliament.ca/politicians/jean-francois-fortin/
http://www.nationsroot.com/canada/members-jean-fran%C3%A7ois-fortin
Twitter?
Facebook?
*****
"
However, Canada appears to deviate from this avenue, Ottawa has announced the end of access to marijuana program on March 31. Canadians use cannabis for therapeutic purposes will now buy from authorized by the RCMP commercial producers.
A deplorable decision that Mr. St-Maurice, who is "very disturbed" by the context in which it was taken.
"People (who use for medical purposes) have invested significant sums for their facilities and are suddenly forced to buy from a company. This is not a responsible approach, "he said.
The majority of marijuana use for recreational purposes, a reason to legalize said Mr. St-Maurice, as the criminalization of substance to regulate this behavior has "never worked."
"We should be realistic and admit that it is an activity that occurs. There are fifteen, twenty years, we wanted to deny homosexuality but we finally woke up and we would have thought the same-sex marriage was crazy but now think no more. "
"
Le Canada semble toutefois s'écarter de cette avenue, Ottawa ayant annoncé la fin du Programme d'accès à la marijuana dès le 31 mars. Les Canadiens consommant du cannabis à des fins thérapeutiques devront dorénavant s'approvisionner auprès de producteurs commerciaux autorisés par la Gendarmerie royale du Canada.
Une décision déplorable selon M. St-Maurice, qui se dit «très dérangé» par le cadre dans laquelle elle a été prise.
«Les gens (qui consomment à des fins médicales) ont investi des sommes importantes pour leurs installations et sont soudainement obligés d'acheter auprès d'une compagnie. Ce n'est pas une approche responsable», a-t-il indiqué.
La majorité des consommateurs de marijuana l'utilisent à des fins récréatives, une raison de plus pour la légaliser, a poursuivi M. St-Maurice, puisque la criminalisation de la substance pour encadrer ce comportement n'a «jamais fonctionné».
«On devrait être réaliste, admettre que c'est une activité qui se produit. Il y a quinze, vingt ans, on voulait nier l'homosexualité mais on a fini par se réveiller et on aurait pensé que le mariage du même sexe était une folie mais aujourd'hui on n'y pense même plus.»
http://quebec.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/01/05/quebec-colorado-legalisation-cannabis_n_4545170.html
*****
Don't know stance
*****
On Jan 9, 2014 12:20 PM, "Sam Vekemans" <@gmail.com> wrote:
January 9, 2014
Member: Jean-François Fortin Constituency: Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia Constituency Office: 290 St-Jérome Avenue (Main Office) Matane, Québec G4W 3A9
Telephone: 418-562-0343 Fax: 418-562-7655 Email: Jean-Francois.Fortin@parl.gc.ca
re: Does Jean-François Fortin support the removal of cannabis as a schedule II controlled substance from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (S.C. 1996, c. 19)?
Dear Jean-François Fortin,
Do you support the simple removal of cannabis as a schedule II controlled substance from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (S.C. 1996, c. 19)?, and let it be treated the same as Lettuce, Tomato, Oregano, Roses, Aloe Vera, Fern or any other common garden herb, flower or house plant?
Do you know the difference between Cannabis Sativa, Cannabis Indica, and Cannabis Ruderalis?
I look forward to receiving your responses as it will be made public, so then others wont need to ask you the same question.
Kind regards,
Sam Vekemans (address)
P.S. All 307 Members of Parliament are being asked these same questions.
ref: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-38.8/page-25.html SCHEDULE II (Sections 2, 3, 4 to 7, 10, 29, 55 and 60) 1.Cannabis, its preparations, derivatives and similar synthetic preparations, including ...
http://www.jffortin.info/accueil.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Fran%C3%A7ois_Fortin_(politician)
http://openparliament.ca/politicians/jean-francois-fortin/
http://www.nationsroot.com/canada/members-jean-fran%C3%A7ois-fortin
Twitter?
Facebook?
Jean-François Fortin
Political Affiliation:Bloc Québécois Caucus
Province / Territory:Québec
Web Site:www.jffortin.info/accueil.html (in French only)
Preferred Language:French
Hill Office
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada
K1A 0A6
Telephone: 613-995-1013
Fax: 613-995-5184
Mail may be sent postage-free to any Member of Parliament.
Constituency Office(s)
- 290 St-Jérome Avenue (Main Office) Matane, Québec G4W 3A9 Telephone: 418-562-0343 Fax: 418-562-7655
© House of Commons
*****
Quebec should look to Colorado, wishes St-Maurice
PC | By The Canadian Press Posted: 1/5/2014 11:50 ET | Updated: 05/01/2014 12:49 ET
"
However, Canada appears to deviate from this avenue, Ottawa has announced the end of access to marijuana program on March 31. Canadians use cannabis for therapeutic purposes will now buy from authorized by the RCMP commercial producers.
A deplorable decision that Mr. St-Maurice, who is "very disturbed" by the context in which it was taken.
"People (who use for medical purposes) have invested significant sums for their facilities and are suddenly forced to buy from a company. This is not a responsible approach, "he said.
The majority of marijuana use for recreational purposes, a reason to legalize said Mr. St-Maurice, as the criminalization of substance to regulate this behavior has "never worked."
"We should be realistic and admit that it is an activity that occurs. There are fifteen, twenty years, we wanted to deny homosexuality but we finally woke up and we would have thought the same-sex marriage was crazy but now think no more. "
"
Le Québec devrait prendre exemple sur le Colorado, souhaite St-Maurice
PC
|
Par La Presse Canadienne
Publication: 05/01/2014 11:50 EST | Mis à jour: 05/01/2014 12:49 EST
Le Canada semble toutefois s'écarter de cette avenue, Ottawa ayant annoncé la fin du Programme d'accès à la marijuana dès le 31 mars. Les Canadiens consommant du cannabis à des fins thérapeutiques devront dorénavant s'approvisionner auprès de producteurs commerciaux autorisés par la Gendarmerie royale du Canada.
Une décision déplorable selon M. St-Maurice, qui se dit «très dérangé» par le cadre dans laquelle elle a été prise.
«Les gens (qui consomment à des fins médicales) ont investi des sommes importantes pour leurs installations et sont soudainement obligés d'acheter auprès d'une compagnie. Ce n'est pas une approche responsable», a-t-il indiqué.
La majorité des consommateurs de marijuana l'utilisent à des fins récréatives, une raison de plus pour la légaliser, a poursuivi M. St-Maurice, puisque la criminalisation de la substance pour encadrer ce comportement n'a «jamais fonctionné».
«On devrait être réaliste, admettre que c'est une activité qui se produit. Il y a quinze, vingt ans, on voulait nier l'homosexualité mais on a fini par se réveiller et on aurait pensé que le mariage du même sexe était une folie mais aujourd'hui on n'y pense même plus.»
http://quebec.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/01/05/quebec-colorado-legalisation-cannabis_n_4545170.html
*****
Don't know stance
*****
On Jan 9, 2014 12:20 PM, "Sam Vekemans" <@gmail.com> wrote:
January 9, 2014
Member: Jean-François Fortin Constituency: Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia Constituency Office: 290 St-Jérome Avenue (Main Office) Matane, Québec G4W 3A9
Telephone: 418-562-0343 Fax: 418-562-7655 Email: Jean-Francois.Fortin@parl.gc.ca
re: Does Jean-François Fortin support the removal of cannabis as a schedule II controlled substance from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (S.C. 1996, c. 19)?
Dear Jean-François Fortin,
Do you support the simple removal of cannabis as a schedule II controlled substance from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (S.C. 1996, c. 19)?, and let it be treated the same as Lettuce, Tomato, Oregano, Roses, Aloe Vera, Fern or any other common garden herb, flower or house plant?
Do you know the difference between Cannabis Sativa, Cannabis Indica, and Cannabis Ruderalis?
I look forward to receiving your responses as it will be made public, so then others wont need to ask you the same question.
Kind regards,
Sam Vekemans (address)
P.S. All 307 Members of Parliament are being asked these same questions.
ref: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-38.8/page-25.html SCHEDULE II (Sections 2, 3, 4 to 7, 10, 29, 55 and 60) 1.Cannabis, its preparations, derivatives and similar synthetic preparations, including ...
Labels:
420,
Bloc Québécois,
cannabis,
drugs,
emailed,
legalize,
marihuana,
marijuana,
prohibition,
Quebec
Monday, December 23, 2013
André Bellavance, MP - Richmond—Arthabaska
http://www.parl.gc.ca/MembersOfParliament/ProfileMP.aspx?Key=170182&Language=E
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_Bellavance
http://openparliament.ca/politicians/andre-bellavance/
https://twitter.com/AndreBellavance
Faster Removal of Foreign Criminals Act
Government Orders
October 4th, 2012 / 11:25 a.m.
Bloc
There is a big difference between someone who commits a serious crime and someone who is found guilty of or charged with possession of drugs—marijuana for example—possession of stolen property under $5,000, or public mischief. I do not have many examples, but I believe a person can be charged with public mischief for urinating on the street or in a parking lot. There is a big difference between that type of public mischief and a more serious crime. I am not saying that people should not be punished for mischief; they should. I am just wondering whether that is reason enough to deport someone. There is a big difference between belonging to a street gang and committing public mischief or being in possession of some marijuana.
..
"
http://openparliament.ca/debates/2012/10/4/andre-bellavance-1/
*****
On Dec 9, 2013 8:05 PM, "Sam Vekemans" <@gmail.com> wrote:
December 9, 2013
Member: André Bellavance Constituency Office: 32 Notre-Dame Street East (Main Office) Victoriaville, Québec G6P 3Z5
Telephone: 819-751-1375 Fax: 819-751-5517 Email: andre.bellavance@parl.gc.ca
Dear André Bellavance,
Do you support the simple removal of Cannabis/Marijuana from the criminal code of Canada, and let it be treated the same as Lettuce, Tomato, Oregano, Roses, Aloe Vera, Fern or any other common garden herb, flower or house plant?
Do you know the difference between Cannabis Sativa, Cannabis Indica, and Cannabis Ruderalis?
I look forward to receiving your responses as it will be made public, so then others wont need to ask you the same question.
Kind regards,
Sam Vekemans (address)
P.S. All 303 Members of Parliament are being asked these same questions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_Bellavance
http://openparliament.ca/politicians/andre-bellavance/
https://twitter.com/AndreBellavance
André Bellavance
Web Site:www.andrebellavance.qc.ca/abellavance.asp?no=5493 (in French only)
Preferred Language:French
Hill Office
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada
K1A 0A6
Telephone: 613-995-1554
Fax: 613-995-2026
Mail may be sent postage-free to any Member of Parliament.
Constituency Office(s)
- 32 Notre-Dame Street East (Main Office) Victoriaville, Québec G6P 3Z5 Telephone: 819-751-1375 Fax: 819-751-5517
- 599 Simoneau Blvd Asbestos, Québec J1T 4G7 Telephone: 819-879-6161 Fax: 819-879-1166
- 22-A St. Georges Street PO Box 90 Windsor, Québec J1S 2L7 Telephone: 819-845-5833 Fax: 819-845-2636
© House of Commons
@AndreBellavance Would you vote for Unscheduling Cannabis? Yes/No/Why? #cdnpoli cc: @blocpot pic.twitter.com/pYc6r7hjld
— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) April 14, 2014
*** Faster Removal of Foreign Criminals Act
Government Orders
October 4th, 2012 / 11:25 a.m.
Bloc
André Bellavance
Richmond—Arthabaska, QC
Mr. Speaker, ... ...There is a big difference between someone who commits a serious crime and someone who is found guilty of or charged with possession of drugs—marijuana for example—possession of stolen property under $5,000, or public mischief. I do not have many examples, but I believe a person can be charged with public mischief for urinating on the street or in a parking lot. There is a big difference between that type of public mischief and a more serious crime. I am not saying that people should not be punished for mischief; they should. I am just wondering whether that is reason enough to deport someone. There is a big difference between belonging to a street gang and committing public mischief or being in possession of some marijuana.
..
"
http://openparliament.ca/debates/2012/10/4/andre-bellavance-1/
*****
On Dec 9, 2013 8:05 PM, "Sam Vekemans" <@gmail.com> wrote:
December 9, 2013
Member: André Bellavance Constituency Office: 32 Notre-Dame Street East (Main Office) Victoriaville, Québec G6P 3Z5
Telephone: 819-751-1375 Fax: 819-751-5517 Email: andre.bellavance@parl.gc.ca
Dear André Bellavance,
Do you support the simple removal of Cannabis/Marijuana from the criminal code of Canada, and let it be treated the same as Lettuce, Tomato, Oregano, Roses, Aloe Vera, Fern or any other common garden herb, flower or house plant?
Do you know the difference between Cannabis Sativa, Cannabis Indica, and Cannabis Ruderalis?
I look forward to receiving your responses as it will be made public, so then others wont need to ask you the same question.
Kind regards,
Sam Vekemans (address)
P.S. All 303 Members of Parliament are being asked these same questions.
Labels:
420,
Bloc Québécois,
cannabis,
decriminalize,
drugs,
emailed,
marihuana,
marijuana,
prohibition,
Quebec
Location:
Victoriaville, QC G6P 3Z5, Canada
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.png)

.png)
.png)