Featured Post

E-122 Cannabis Petition - Royal Commission on Cannabis

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Dave MacKenzie, MP - Oxford

http://www.parl.gc.ca/MembersOfParliament/ProfileMP.aspx?Key=170316&Language=E


Dave MacKenzie

Photo - Dave MacKenzie
Political Affiliation:Conservative Caucus
Province / Territory:Ontario
Preferred Language:English
Hill Office House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0A6 Telephone: 613-995-4432 Fax: 613-995-4433 Mail may be sent postage-free to any Member of Parliament.
Constituency Office(s)
  • 208 Huron Street (Main Office) Unit 4 Woodstock, Ontario N4S 7A1 Telephone: 519-421-7690 Fax: 519-421-9704
  • 43 Brock Street East Tillsonburg, Ontario N4G 1Z7 Telephone: 519-688-3620 Fax: 519-688-3622







Strong oppose


***
Motions in Amendment
Safe Streets and Communities Act
Government Orders
November 29th, 2011 / 12:25 p.m.
Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Oxford, ON

"
....
Another criticism that is directed at the mandatory minimum provisions is the suggestion that someone who simply gives a joint of marijuana to a friend would be at risk of receiving the minimum penalty provided by the new provisions in the bill. The definition of trafficking in the CDSA includes giving a drug. Therefore, as a result, giving a joint would be necessarily caught by these new mandatory minimum provisions.
While it is true that giving a drug is included in the definition of trafficking, the provisions of the bill are clear. In order for the mandatory minimum provisions to apply to the offence of trafficking, there must exist one of the aggravating factors listed in the new provision dealing with trafficking. Here again the Minister of Justice has been clear: The application of mandatory minimum penalties would occur only if one or more of the listed aggravating factors were present during the commission of the offence.
A variation of this criticism has been that if a young adult were to give a marijuana joint to a friend while at school, the person giving the joint would be liable to a minimum penalty of two years' imprisonment. The argument here is that one of the aggravating factors is present, that trafficking has occurred in a school, and therefore the minimum penalty must apply.
Here again, the criticism is misplaced. Clause 39 of the bill at the very outset states that paragraph 5(3)(a) is subject to paragraph (a.1). Paragraph (a.1) provides a penalty of anyone trafficking in cannabis in an amount that is equal to or less than three kilograms. That penalty is a maximum term of imprisonment of up to five years.
...
Our government recognizes that serious drug crimes, including marijuana grow operations and clandestine methamphetamine labs, continue to pose a threat to the safety of our streets and communities. Bill C-10 contains significant elements forming part of our strategy to address this problem.
The bill proposes amendments to strengthen the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act provisions regarding penalties for serious drug offences by ensuring these types of offences are punished by an imposition of mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment.
...
"
http://openparliament.ca/debates/2011/11/29/dave-mackenzie-1/

No comments:

Post a Comment