http://www.parl.gc.ca/MembersOfParliament/ProfileMP.aspx?Key=199875&Language=E
http://www.tedfalk.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Falk
http://openparliament.ca/politicians/ted-falk/
https://www.facebook.com/ted.falk.75
https://twitter.com/MPTedFalk
Ted Falk
Email:Ted.Falk@parl.gc.ca
Preferred Language:English
Hill Office
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada
K1A 0A6
Telephone: 613-992-3128
Fax: 613-995-1049
Mail may be sent postage-free to any Member of Parliament.
Constituency Office(s)
- 227 Main Street, Suite 8 (Main Office) Steinbach, Manitoba R5G 1Y7 Telephone: 204-326-9889 Fax: 204-346-9874
© House of Commons
"
Madam Speaker, that is an excellent question from my colleague, which requires a lengthy answer.
My guess is that with the legalization of marijuana, the new government is going to hope that everybody is living in such euphoria here that nobody will notice the extra burden.
"
Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply
Speech from the Throne
December 8th, 2015 / 3:55 p.m.
Conservative
Ted Falk Provencher, MB
https://openparliament.ca/debates/2015/12/8/ted-falk-4/
.png)
@MPTedFalk Y U No Unschedule Cannabis? Y u No have Education? It kills cancer ya no - safer than alcohol! #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/JDKWZJL3yE
— Sam Vekemans (@acrosscanada) May 14, 2014
********
(undated article) -' Falk Reacts To Trudeau Visit' http://www.steinbachonline.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38541&Itemid=100457
Falk then goes on to say he takes exception to Trudeau's views in favour of legalizing marijuana.
"It seems to me one of Trudeau's platforms has been to legalize marijuana. Clearly our government is focused on preventing illicit drug use and I think that's an important issue to the constituents of Provencher. It's also very disturbing to me when a leader of any national party admits to the use of an illegal mind-altering drug. I don't think that's appropriate for a Member of Parliament and certainly not for the leader of any political party."
When asked about Trudeau's assertion that the government's current approach to marijuana is not working, Falk replies, "Perhaps it's because the sentences are not harsh enough for distributing and using those kinds of things."
Meanwhile, Falk says he is getting many messages of support for the Conservative Party as he travels throughout the riding.
"We feel good in our riding that we've got strong support right across the riding. We've had many constituents tell us, as we've travelled around the riding, that they're looking forward to again supporting the Conservative Government in this next by-election."
********
On Jan 6, 2014 10:38 AM, "Sam Vekemans" <@gmail.com> wrote:
January 6, 2014
Member: Ted Falk Constituency: Provencher Constituency Office: 227 Main Street, Suite 8 (Main Office) Steinbach, Manitoba R5G 1Y7
Telephone: 204-326-9889 Fax: 204-346-9874 Email: Ted.Falk@parl.gc.ca
re: Does Ted Falk support the removal of cannabis as a schedule II controlled substance from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (S.C. 1996, c. 19)?
Dear Ted Falk,
Do you support the simple removal of cannabis as a schedule II controlled substance from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (S.C. 1996, c. 19)?, and let it be treated the same as Lettuce, Tomato, Oregano, Roses, Aloe Vera, Fern or any other common garden herb, flower or house plant?
Do you know the difference between Cannabis Sativa, Cannabis Indica, and Cannabis Ruderalis?
I look forward to receiving your responses as it will be made public, so then others wont need to ask you the same question.
Kind regards,
Sam Vekemans (address)
P.S. All 307 Members of Parliament are being asked these same questions.
ref: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-38.8/page-25.html SCHEDULE II (Sections 2, 3, 4 to 7, 10, 29, 55 and 60) 1.Cannabis, its preparations, derivatives and similar synthetic preparations, including ... .
No comments:
Post a Comment