Featured Post

E-122 Cannabis Petition - Royal Commission on Cannabis

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Peter Stoffer, MP - Sackville-Eastern Shore

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/Peter-Stoffer%2888%29
http://openparliament.ca/politicians/peter-stoffer/
https://twitter.com/PeterStofferMP - has not tweeted
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Peter-Stoffer/106274709404605 - facebook page is the wikipedia generated page

Peter Stoffer

Photo - Peter Stoffer
Political Affiliation:New Democratic Party Caucus
Province / Territory:Nova Scotia
Preferred Language:English
Hill Office House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0A6 Telephone: 613-995-5822 Fax: 613-996-9655 Mail may be sent postage-free to any Member of Parliament.
Constituency Office(s)
  • 2900 Highway 2 (Main Office) Fall River, Nova Scotia B2T 1W4 Telephone: 902-861-2311 Fax: 902-861-4620
© House of Commons



Decriminalize

****


***
Criminal Code
Government Orders
October 29th, 2003 / 5 p.m.
NDP

Peter Stoffer Sackville—Musquodoboit Valley—Eastern Shore, NS
The member mentions the Le Dain commission.
The reality is that we should not hide away from the debate. Many people can offer sound solutions. I am one who does not believe that if a 17 year old uses a joint in an indiscretion, or on an experimental basis or whatever, that individual should have a criminal record for life. Should that person be smoking marijuana? No. Should we educate individuals to inform them of the harm of marijuana or of any other drug use? Absolutely. To give them a criminal record is simply not going to do it. That has not worked in over 40 years. What makes us think it is going to work now?
The reality is that this type of legislation, along with a drug policy that is effective and educational, where we can see results with timelines, is the way to go. If we think a zero tolerance policy would work, we can just look at what happened in the United States with Reagan. It was a complete, absolute, abject failure.
So yes, we should encourage debate on this, but I remind the House that we have had this type of debate for a long time. On the particular aspects of Bill C-32, we support some of the initiatives to get it into committee so we can improve it. However, I fear that this bill, like most bills before the House of Commons, will die if the House prorogues, and we will probably end up having this conversation very soon in the near future.
http://openparliament.ca/debates/2003/10/29/peter-stoffer-3/

No comments:

Post a Comment